THE NEW MOON LOOMS BLACK IN THE DARK SKY

Jordon Conner – Unsplash

The night sky has always been miraculous. Even before humanity came to understand the impact of the moon on earth’s seas, it is easy to understand how calendars began marking lunar time. While the location of the sun came to reveal the time of day, and the trajectory height of the sun’s path associated with the seasons, the moon’s changes in visibility governed cycles into months.

Thinking of the moon commonly conjures images of white fullness against a sea of black, a sphere of peace amid the תֹ֙הוּ֙ וָבֹ֔הוּ וְחֹ֖שֶׁךְ tohu v’vohu chaos and void (Genesis 1:2) of seeming endless blackness. Yet the Jewish holiday of Rosh Chodesh celebrates the arrival of a new Hebrew month with the birth of every new moon. Setting the month in the darkness of the new moon may follow the wisdom seeded within the Torah’s story of creation spanning from evening to evening, וַֽיְהִי־עֶ֥רֶב וַֽיְהִי־בֹ֖קֶר vayahi erev vayahi boker there was setting there was dawning (Genesis 1:5).

God calls for light and it appears. God proclaims the light good, makes distinct within the dark, naming light day and dark night. This binary separation and naming originating through the first day of creation (Genesis 1:4-5) repeats in the separation of the water of the heavens from the water of the seas (Genesis 1:6-8), sea from the first place of dry land (Genesis 1:9-10), and adding lanterns to further mark night and day (Genesis 1:14-18). Genesis 1:16 opens with God creating two great luminaries before immediately suggesting the larger light rule the day and the smaller rule the night.

As the story of creation continues, God brings forth grass, seeds, fruit trees, sun, moon, stars, water creepers, flying birds, sea monsters, herd animals, land animals, and humans (Genesis 1:2-27). Each introduction affected what was surrounding it.

All water on earth is connect to the seas. All water is affected by the gravitational pull of the moon. Yet, noticeable effects are increased or diminished by volume.

In Chullin 60b:2-4, Rabbi Shimon ben Pazi notes the contradiction between equality and what appears to be an immediate shift. Pazi shares midrash outlining an exchange between moon and God. It’s easy to wonder about the moon’s motives in questioning, and blame the lessening as a repercussion of confronting God. Making an analogy to the doctrine of separate but equal can offer another perspective of the moon as a body of light willing to speak up and call out separation presented as equal that is not.

There is more to be curious about in these lines–­–referencing kings (masculine plural) and speaking ‘to her’ in an equality framework, God’s ability to call forth creation and separation through words yet directing moon to diminish itself, humans bringing sacrifice to atone for a transgression of God, the stars being luminarily ignored, and linguistic associations with great-lesser and light-dark, for example. Amidst the questions, a beautiful aspect of this midrash is that God listens to moon, and continues to try to make reparations. In the culminating attempt, God notices moon is not comforted. God acknowledges the harm, attempts to make amends, and pays attention to the result.

This story could be minimized as cleaning up one’s mistake. This moment can also be read as allyship. Intentional, careless, and unconscious harm are distinct states. Making mistakes is inevitable and can happen through carelessness or unconsciously. How we respond is what matters most. We are theanthropic bodies affected by and affecting the world around us. This midrash invites us to pay attention when questions are raised, consider actions, and pay attention that an intention of solution lands as such. There’s also an unspoken message of mutual responsibility. Moon braves speaking up and God braves making repair. Along the way, both brave listening to the other.

Chodesh Tov Adar

Bilhah Zilpah Project – Vayeshev

One of the unique qualities in the source sheets for the Bilhah Zilpah Project is that they only include the Torah lines that reference Bilhah, Zilpah, or their children. As characters that have always been there, but whom often have to be introduced when brought into Torah study, this choice was an attempt to keep the focus on Bilhah and Zilpah.

Next Shabbat, we read Vayeshev, which contains a single line invoking Bilhah and Zilpah. Breishit 37:2 finishes the long accounting of the descendants of Yaakov that ends Vayishlakh. The line returns Bilhah and Zilpah to the status of wives.

The parasha is named for the opening line he dwelled. Bilhah and Zilpah dwelled as well. We learn that Yosef is seventeen. This can help us guess minimum ages for Bilhah and Zilpah. By now, these women have now dwelled through multiple stags of their lives and enslavement to reside as concubine matriarchs of one third of the twelve tribe namesakes.

The feud between Rachel and Leah lives on through Yaakov’s children even after Rachel’s death. Yosef is identified as being the favored son (of the favored wife). However, the line also suggests that Yosef worked alongside Bilhah and Zilpah’s children in specific tasks of tending the sheep. The negative reports could be of all of the brothers, but why mention Bilhah and Zilpah if not to indicate that the report defames Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher? The children were named after all, not for hopes of their futures, but for how Rachel and Leah hoped their births would affect their relationship with Yaakov, even the children of Bilhah and Zilpah.

Despite the Torah laying out the intention that Bilhah and Zilpah’s children would belong to Rachel and Leah, Bilhah and Zilpah appear to have retained their status as mother. However, this line invites consideration for if their children were seen differently and for the legacy of how these children were named.

Reflection Questions:

• What do you notice in the begetting accounting, especially relative to Bilhah and Zilpah?

• How have the status of Bilhah and Zilpah changed over time?

• What clues do we have about the relationships Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher had with their brothers?

Our homecoming continues with: Bilhah Zilpah Dreaming: Creative Play for Reclamation on Sunday December 3. You can also join us for the third and final event in this series: Bilhah & Zilpah Drew Near: Listening for Torah Women’s Wisdom on Sunday December 17.

Meanwhile, look out for our next Bilhah Zilpah Project email on Sunday December 10. And, if you missed it, check out the Vayishlakh and Vayeitzei reflections…

We see you Bilhah & Zilpah!